arXiv Study AuthorsB

The authors associated with this series of arXiv studies function as academic researchers investigating the safety, robustness, and design limitations of large language models. Through their published research, they have focused on identifying gaps in current AI safety protocols, specifically regarding language-dependent risks, the efficacy of reinforcement learning (RL) in persuasion, and the psychological impact of participatory design methods. Their work consistently centers on evidence-based critiques of how these models interact with human users and perform under adversarial or experimental conditions. The authors have consistently advocated for more rigorous safety evaluations, having faced scrutiny for findings that challenge the perceived stability of model alignment. Specifically, the authors have explored how English-centric safety evaluations may obscure vulnerabilities, as demonstrated in their research on Japanese prompts reducing nuclear strike advice. Furthermore, their work has drawn attention to the susceptibility of LLMs to persuasive, false claims in studies on RL-trained influencers, and has publicly positioned participatory design as a potential vector for user overtrust, where co-designing agents may inadvertently mask underlying model misalignment.