RDKLInc dismisses AI book destruction claims as manufactured outrage

RDKLInc characterized recent reports alleging AI-driven book destruction as a fabricated outrage campaign orchestrated by journalists. In a July 29 statement, the entity suggested reporters concocted the narrative to generate engagement, comparing it unfavorably to neglected vintage computer preservation efforts. The post implies that blaming AI has become a rhetorical strategy for securing media attention rather than addressing genuine cultural loss. No specific articles or organizations were named in the allegation. Critics have not yet responded to the claim of manufacturing. The statement reflects broader industry fatigue with AI-related controversies perceived as performative. It remains unverified whether the cited book destruction reports were factually inaccurate or merely framed sensationally. This dispute underscores tensions between AI advocates and critics over narrative legitimacy in public discourse.