Economist Milanović stops replying to readers over AI spam doubts
Is this a scandal?
No longer — the story has resolved. Noise 30/100, cooling down, across 1 source.
Public intellectuals will increasingly adopt verified-human-only communication channels or cease public engagement entirely because the cognitive cost of filtering synthetic interactions now exceeds the value of open correspondence.
Noise 30/100 — louder than 95% of tracked AI controversies.
Why it matters
Highlights how synthetic communication degrades trust in public discourse, forcing experts to withdraw from genuine engagement and accelerating social fragmentation.
Key points
- Branko Milanović confirmed he no longer replies to any reader messages regarding his published books.
- He estimates the majority of adulatory correspondence received over six months is AI-generated rather than authentic.
- Milanović expressed psychological distress over potentially ignoring genuine human connection attempts.
- The economist explicitly linked synthetic communication to the destruction of normal human social bonds.
- This case exemplifies the 'liar's dividend' where AI existence causes dismissal of legitimate human speech.
The story
Prominent economist Branko Milanović stated on September 10, 2026, that he has ceased responding to reader correspondence due to an inability to distinguish authentic messages from AI-generated content. Milanović reported receiving adulatory messages about his books for six months, noting that while some appear genuine, he suspects most are synthetic. He expressed concern that this uncertainty forces him to ignore potentially real inquiries, causing personal distress and damaging intellectual exchange. The economist characterized the phenomenon as destructive to normal human bonds. This admission illustrates a growing challenge for public figures navigating digital communication channels saturated with automated text generation tools.
Who's involved
AI-generated correspondence creates unresolvable ambiguity that destroys authentic human connection and intellectual exchange.
Generative models are neutral tools whose misuse in spam does not reflect inherent flaws in the technology.
Noise Level
The timeline
Milanović publicly declares communication withdrawal
Economist posts on Twitter detailing his decision to stop replying to all messages due to AI authenticity doubts.
Onset of suspected AI correspondence surge
Milanović identifies start of six-month period marked by influx of suspiciously adulatory messages about his books.
The full record
Sources & methodology
- twitter.com — twitter.com
Every claim above traces to these primary items. How we score →
The forecast
Public intellectuals will increasingly adopt verified-human-only communication channels or cease public engagement entirely because the cognitive cost of filtering synthetic interactions now exceeds the value of open correspondence.
Forecast, not fact — an editorial estimate we score when this resolves.
That's the complete picture as of — nothing more to know right now. We'll update this page the moment it changes.
Join the Discussion
Discuss this story
Community comments coming in a future update
Be the first to share your perspective. Subscribe to comment.