Esc
RegulationEmerging

Leaked Flock Webinar Reveals Police Training to Track Protesters

Is this a scandal?

Not yet — an early signal. Noise 33/100, holding steady, across 1 source.

SCAND-228814as of Methodology
Cite this incident"Leaked Flock Webinar Reveals Police Training to Track Protesters." SCAND.Ai incident SCAND-228814, noise 33/100 as of September 12, 2026. https://scand.ai/scandal/leaked-flock-webinar-reveals-police-training-to-track-protesters
FORECASTForecast, not fact

Municipalities will likely pause or review Flock Safety contracts while legislators introduce ALPR-specific protest surveillance bans because documented misuse creates immediate liability and public trust deficits.

33

Noise 33/100 — louder than 99% of tracked AI controversies.

AI-assisted analysis · How we work

Why it matters

Demonstrates automated license plate readers are actively repurposed for protest surveillance, challenging civil liberty protections and accelerating calls for ALPR regulation.

Key points

  1. Leaked webinar footage depicts officers being trained to use Flock Safety ALPR systems to track No Kings protest attendees.
  2. The video demonstrates workflows specifically designed for monitoring political demonstrations rather than traditional criminal investigations.
  3. Privacy advocates allege the training materials constitute evidence of unconstitutional surveillance mission creep by law enforcement.
  4. Flock Safety has not publicly verified the video's authenticity or addressed allegations regarding protest-specific training modules.
  5. The leak fuels current legislative efforts to regulate municipal contracts with automated license plate reader vendors.

The story

A leaked webinar video reveals law enforcement officers receiving training on using Flock Safety automated license plate reader technology to monitor participants in the No Kings protest movement. The recording, circulated online in September 2026, demonstrates specific workflows for tracking vehicles associated with political demonstrations rather than criminal investigations. Flock Safety has not commented on the authenticity of the footage or its training protocols regarding First Amendment activities. Civil liberties advocates allege the training evidences mission creep from traffic safety to mass political surveillance. The leak intensifies ongoing legislative debates concerning municipal contracts with private surveillance vendors. Privacy researchers note this represents a documented operational shift in how ALPR networks are deployed during civil unrest. Law enforcement agencies utilizing the platform have not confirmed whether such protest-specific modules are standard curriculum. The incident raises significant questions about vendor oversight and constitutional compliance in public safety technology procurement.

Who's involved

Critic
Reddit User /u/Angman_Dutt

Disseminated the leaked webinar to highlight potential civil liberties violations in protest surveillance

Critic
Civil Liberties Advocates

Allege the training demonstrates systematic repurposing of safety technology for unconstitutional political monitoring

Defender
Flock Safety

Has not yet responded to inquiries regarding the authenticity or content of the alleged training video

Join the Discussion

Discuss this story

Community comments coming in a future update

Be the first to share your perspective. Subscribe to comment.

Noise Level

Murmur33?Noise Score (0–100): how loud a controversy is. Composite of reach, engagement, star power, cross-platform spread, polarity, duration, and industry impact — with 7-day decay.
Decay: 84%
Reach
38
Engagement
46
Star Power
25
Duration
60
Cross-Platform
20
Polarity
50
Industry Impact
50

The timeline

  1. Webinar Leak Posted to Reddit

    User /u/Angman_Dutt uploaded video allegedly showing police training on tracking No Kings protesters via Flock Safety

The full record

Sources & methodology

Every claim above traces to these primary items. How we score →

The forecast

Municipalities will likely pause or review Flock Safety contracts while legislators introduce ALPR-specific protest surveillance bans because documented misuse creates immediate liability and public trust deficits.

Forecast, not fact — an editorial estimate we score when this resolves.

You're up to date

That's the complete picture as of — nothing more to know right now. We'll update this page the moment it changes.

Follow this story

We keep this page current — no need to check back. We'll send the next real change to your inbox, nothing else.

Tracking this story since September 6, 2026.